Spencer Carbines: An 1865 Cavalry Corps Report

This article is a slight departure from recent posts, which focused on broader Old Army subjects.  The goal of Old Army Records is to present a wide array of data for a comprehensive history of the 19th century U.S. Army.  As a result, some articles will discuss very specific topics about the food, pay, equipment, and weapons used by soldiers of the period.  When viewed together subject matter helps paint a complete picture of Old Army life.  With this mind, we present the following about one of the most highly sought after weapons of the Civil War, Spencer Carbines, as compared with other cavalry weapons.

In February 1865, the American Civil War was rapidly drawing to a conclusion.  At the time Union commanders consolidated their cavalry into autonomous units and sent them to destroy communications, transportation, and industry in the South.  One such unit was the Cavalry Corps of the Military Division of the Mississippi (MDM).  Just prior to participating in the final phase of war, Captain Henry E. Noyes, Acting Assistant Inspector General (AAIG) for the Corps, prepared a report summarizing the merits of various carbines and rifles and ammunition then being used by cavalrymen assigned to the MDM.  Inspectors noted and reported upon a wide array of subjects pertaining to the efficiency of the army.  Significant topics coming under the purview of inspectors included the condition and serviceability of supplies, arms, and equipment.

MDM Cavalry Corps, 1st Division, and 2nd Division Guidons. oldarmyrecords.com
MDM Cavalry Corps, 1st Division, and 2nd Division Guidons as shown in an 1887 publication issued by the Quartermaster General.
MDM Cavalry Corps

Established at the end of October 1864, the MDM Cavalry Corps consolidated numerous cavalry units into a centrally-controlled organization.  Brevet Major General James H. Wilson assumed command of the corps.  Although some of his cavalrymen fought at the Battle of Nashville (December 1864), Wilson spent the fall and winter of 1864/1865 organizing and equipping his force.  One of  Wilson’s first tasks was to outfit his unit for combat and as a result he requested 10,000 each of; Spencer Carbines or, if not available, Sharps Carbines, sets of horse equipment, and light cavalry sabers and 300 rounds of ammunition per carbine.  However, the request took months to fulfill.  By the end of February 1865 the Cavalry Corps consisted of about 25,000 men assigned to seven divisions (designated 1st-7th).

Noyes’ 11-page Report on “Spencer Arms and Ammunition” Compared With That of Other Arms included a summary table, sub-reports, and a summation/ recommendations section prepared by the author.  The sub-reports were completed by the units not serving elsewhere, the 1st, 2nd, and 5th divisions, a detachment of the 4th Division, and the 4th U.S. Cavalry Regiment.  Ironically, the MDM Cavalry Corps served under the command of Major General William T. Sherman, but only the 3rd Division served directly with him.  Noyes’ divisional/ regimental counterpart prepared these summaries:

1st Division (Captain Seneca P. Goulding, 7th Kentucky Cavalry)

2nd Division (Captain Jesse N. Squire, 3rd Ohio Cavalry)

4th Division (Lieutenant William T. Benton, 7th Ohio Cavalry)

5th Division (Captain James P. Metcalf, 2nd Iowa Cavalry)

4th U.S. Cavalry (2nd Lieutenant Sebastian Gunther, 4th U.S. Cavalry – Acting Adjutant)

Spencer Carbines, and Other Weapons, Issued to the MDM Cavalry Corps

The carbines carried by the Corps were a good representation of weapons in use at the time.  The unit carried nearly 7,000 Spencer Carbines, by far the majority of carbines represented.  The cavalrymen also carried weapons that fired other metallic cartridges including the Ballard, Burnside, and Warner carbines.  The third type of firearm included those chambered for combustible cartridges (i.e. cartridges made from paper or linen).  The Sharps Carbine and Colt Rifle used combustible ammunition.  The following lists the types of weapons used by the reporting units:

1st Division:            Spencer, Warner, Burnside, Sharps, Ballard, Maynard, and Joslyn (improved and old models) carbines and Spencer, Colts, and Springfield rifles

2nd Division:           Spencer, Sharps, and Burnside carbines

4th Division:            Spencer and Burnside carbines

5th Division:            Spencer, Sharps, and Maynard carbines and Colts Rifle

4th U.S. Cavalry:     Spencer Carbines

The report begins with a summary table organized by weapons/ ammunition type and the division that carried them.  The table includes a detailed accounting of the total number of rounds drawn, expended, and lost.  Each report includes critical, albeit brief, synopsis of the firearms by the respective units.

Excerpt from Noyes’ Report on “Spencer Arms and Ammunition” Compared With That of Other Arms.
Ammunition

The five reporting units drew nearly 1.8 million rounds of ammunition, including 710,000 rounds for the Spencer carbines and rifles.  They expended about 70% of these rounds; the remaining 30% were lost.  The 2nd Division drew 275,000 rounds of Spencer ammunition and, amazingly, listed 100% as expended.  However, this summary came with the caveat that all ammunition was listed as expended, “as it is impossible to ascertain the amount broken or wasted.”

The report notes the loss of Spencer ammunition at a low 4%.  Conversely, the report listed 27% (194,722) of the combustible ammunition lost.  The 5th Division left White’s Station, Tennessee with most of the ammunition carried on pack mules or in saddle bags.  Despite being subjected to “4 or 5 days” of wet weather and being jostled in saddle bags the Spencer ammunition remained uninjured.  The weather and mode of transport, however, ruined 75,000 rounds of Sharps and 12,000 rounds of Colt Rifle ammunition.  In another instance, the detachment of 4th U.S. Cavalry lost two boxes of Spencer ammunition in the Duck River, Tennessee for nearly two days.  The ammunition “was only partially injured” and presumably used.

Report Conclusions

The reports unanimously rated the Spencer Carbine superior to other weapons.  It received high marks for serviceability, rate of loading and firing, and ease of use while mounted or on foot.  Lieutenant Gunther stated that “[i]n the hands of a reliable man, it is fully adequate to perform the work of Four ordinary Breech loading Carbines.”  Noyes stated that the Spencer Carbine “is a universal favorite with officers as well as men in this command.”  Not surprisingly, the Spencer and Springfield rifles were not recommended for cavalry service because their size prohibited them from being effectively used on horseback.  These weapons were issued out of necessity, there being no other arms available.

The Sharps Carbine also ranked high for its range, accuracy, and penetration into a target.  However, the paper and linen cartridges, used by the Sharps, were not durable and susceptible to loss from moisture and rough handling.  Not surprisingly, the metallic Spencer cartridges rated high for durability and reliability; few misfired.

MDM Cavalry Corps Badge. oldarmyrecords.com
The importance of the Spencer Carbine to the MDM Cavalry Corps is best perhaps best reflected in their corps badge shown in an 1887 publication issued by the Quartermaster General.
Action After the Report

The MDM Cavalry Corps began its last campaign not long after the issuance of Report on “Spencer Arms and Ammunition”.   All of the units mentioned in the report, except the 5th Division, participated in the sweep through Alabama and Georgia.  Significantly, Wilson himself led the Cavalry Corps, which captured or destroyed a significant amount of Confederate property.  The 4th Division, for example, captured 3,000 prisoners, 39 pieces of artillery, and 13 battle flags.  The effectiveness of carbines, especially the Spencers, and sheer volume of ammunition supplied to the Corps no doubt contributed to the success.

Noyes and AAIG counterparts served as aides de camp for their respective commanders.  As a result, their roles as inspectors did not restrict them to desk duty.  On April 10th, the 2nd Indiana Cavalry engaged Confederate forces near Benton, Alabama.  Unfortunately, the Indiana cavalrymen charged in the wrong direction and into a swamp and during the melee Seneca P. Goulding, 1st Division AAIG, drowned.  Goulding died just one day after Lee’s surrender to Grant at Appomattox Courthouse.

Noyes served on Wilson’s staff and in this capacity he escorted and turned over to the War Department 24 stands of colors and records from Andersonville Prison, all captured by the Cavalry Corps.  An 1861 graduate of West Point, Noyes ably served as a company commander throughout the late 1860s and 1870s, served as regimental staff (major, lieutenant colonel and colonel), before retiring as a brigadier general in 1904.

Connecting an Individual to a Specific Weapon

During the course of scanning and indexing original documents for the Old Army Records database, we have discovered hundreds of serial numbers for martial firearms dating to the late 19th century.  Individuals who used these weapons are often mentioned with the serial numbers.  Please contact us if you feel that this type of information is useful.

Sources

Biographical Register of the Officers and Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, Since Its Establishment in 1802.  Entry 1955.

Report on “Spencer Arms and Ammunition” Compared With That of Other Arms, Cavalry Corps, Military Division of the Mississippi, February 25th 1865.

United States. War Department. The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.  Volumes 39 (1892), 45 (1895), and 49 (1897).

2 thoughts on “Spencer Carbines: An 1865 Cavalry Corps Report

  • October 7, 2018 at 5:43 pm
    Permalink

    A fascinating report on the Spencer carbine, my favorite rifle. I have never heard of the Warner carbine but will do some research. Thanks.

    Reply
    • October 9, 2018 at 10:01 am
      Permalink

      Robert thanks for your interest and comment on our “Spencer Carbines: An
      1865 Cavalry Corps Report” post. We are constantly amazed as to the amount and depth
      of information on every aspect of the Old Army that is contained in the original Old
      Army documents.
      Since the Spencer Carbine is your favorite rifle, you may want to have a look at our
      newest post “Old Army Numbers: Cavalry Costs (1867)” to see who else thought highly
      of the weapon.
      As for the Warner, it wasn’t used in the Old Army as much as the Spencer arms after
      the Civil War so didn’t enjoy the benefits of the longer service life such as
      popularity and loyalty. Warner Civil War Cavalry Carbines by J. Alan Hassell (2000) is an excellent source for more
      information on the Warner.
      I hope you will continue to visit and explore our site and leave us comments. And good luck in your research. Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *